Egor Gerasimov vs Minghui Zhang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Jun at 05:16 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Gerasimov vs M. Zhang

BLR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Gerasimov 1 - 0 Zhang
They have played 2 sets in total, with Egor Gerasimov winning 2 and Minghui Zhang winning 0. The last match between Egor Gerasimov and Minghui Zhang was at the M25 Luzhou, 18-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Egor Gerasimov getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gerasimov | 1 |
| Zhang | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Luzhou(06-18-25)
E. Gerasimov vs M. Zhang H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,093,630 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.36% (443-343) | Career Total W/L | 42.86% (39-52) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 9 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Gerasimov vs M. Zhang Match Preview:
- Regarding recent second serve performance, Zhang slightly edges out Gerasimov with 45.45% of points won compared to Gerasimov's 45.33%. Is this marginal difference significant? Possibly, given its predictive correlation.
- In terms of return game, Zhang excels by capturing 48.75% of opponents' second serve points, surpassing Gerasimov's 47.06%. When facing first serves, Zhang dominates with 28.15%, while Gerasimov lags at 24.35%.
- Under pressure, Gerasimov appears more resilient with a 62.59% breakpoint save rate, which is significantly higher than Zhang's 40.91%. Can this resilience impact the match's outcome? It certainly could in crucial games.
- Over the past year, Zhang has a slight advantage in match wins at 47.83%, against Gerasimov's 43.59%. How might this affect predictions? A higher win percentage often provides confidence.
- Player surface preferences reveal Zhang's best results on Hard surfaces (42%), while Gerasimov thrives Indoors at 61%. Could playing surfaces sway the match result? Absolutely, as surface comfort correlates with performance.
- In terms of tournament level, Zhang has mainly participated in lower-tier events, whereas Gerasimov often competes in higher-level Challengers. Might this impact competitive edge? Experience in tougher competitions typically benefits player competence.
- Examining opponent quality, Zhang consistently faces higher-ranked rivals (average rank 153.3) compared to Gerasimov's (rank 406.51), possibly sharpening Zhang’s skills against stronger opponents.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Zhang's stronger record with 61% wins contrasts with Gerasimov's 56%. How might this affect strategies? A favorable deciding set record can be reassuring.
- On breakpoint conversion, Gerasimov leads with 34.57%, substantially better than Zhang's 22.73%. This edge in converting crucial points could be decisive.
Editorial Prediction (June 18, 2025, UTC):
Assessing recent performances and critical statistics, Zhang and Gerasimov present an intriguing face-off. Zhang demonstrates slightly better form in second serve points and return games, coupled with a favorable record in deciding sets. These stats suggest competitive edge in key rally phases.
Gerasimov's resilience under pressure, as evidenced by higher breakpoint save and conversion rates, suggests potential dominance in high-stakes moments. Moreover, his success on Indoor Hard surfaces and superior breakpoint conversion could tip the scales.
Overall, while Zhang's consistent performance against higher-ranked opponents is noteworthy, Gerasimov's aptitude in pressure situations and surface preference on Indoor Hard courts position him as a likely candidate to win this upcoming match.
Egor Gerasimov vs Minghui Zhang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Gerasimov vs M. Zhang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:18:22 | Average Match Time | 1:18:22 |
| 56% (30/54) | 1st Serve % | 54% (31/57) |
| 83% (25/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (17/31) |
| 42% (10/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (8/26) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/7) |
| 56% (32/57) | Return Points Win % | 35% (19/54) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Gerasimov Recent Matches Played
M. Zhang Recent Matches Played

E. Gerasimov vs M. Zhang Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.36% (443/343) | YTD Win/Loss | 42.86% (39/52) |
| 54.87% (1031/848) | Sets Win/Loss | 43.13% (91/120) |
| 51.83% (9450/8782) | Games Win/Loss | 48.30% (1007/1078) |
| 58.41% (198/141) | Hard Win/Loss | 45.33% (34/41) |
| 45.74% (59/70) | Clay Win/Loss | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 60.20% (183/121) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 21.43% (3/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.47 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 4217 | Aces Total | 56 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 |
| 1855 | Total Double Faults | 94 |
| 1:15:4 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 538.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 156.29 |
| 64% (29026/45497) | 1st Serve % | 60% (1202/1991) |
| 73% (21056/29026) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (733/1202) |
| 49% (8063/16463) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (385/789) |
| 40% (1547/3832) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 35% (67/193) |
| 37% (16778/45051) | Return Points Win % | 38% (739/1937) |
| 30.77% (12/27) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 21.05% (4/15) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 72.00% (18/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54.66% (88/73) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.31% (200/149) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62.83% (120/71) | Futures W/L | 42.86% (39/52) |
| 56% (423/751) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (37/89) |
| 57% (16/28) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (165/322) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (8/19) |
| 53% (146/274) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (14/30) |
| 86% (422/361) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (36/29) |
| 14% (422/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (36/7) |
| 23% (363/83) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (55/9) |